for Christians & Messianic Jews

Forum index page

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." John 3:16

Pro Rege (For the King)


Log in | Register
Forgot your password?


Who is Babylon (One world religion?) (Islam Danger)

posted by Zedinhim(R), 09.28.2014

Hey fezik, I’m ok, thank you for asking.
It’s interesting to note that the four gospels hadn't been written yet so Paul couldn't go to the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke or John, and Paul wasn’t at the Lord’s Supper. But rather Paul's interpretation of the Lord's Supper came by revelation.
I Corinthians 11:23-26
"For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus, the same night in which he was betrayed, took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, `Take, eat; this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.' After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, `This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.'"

Verse 26 gives us the explanation. And isn't it amazing how God does everything in His own order, as before the four Gospels were ever written Paul writes to the Corinthians the very same words. So if we read in I Corinthians, verse 26, here is the doctrinal reason for the Lord's Supper.

I Corinthians 11:26
"For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew (or remind yourself of) the Lord's death till he come."

Surly you’re not going to tell me that our Lord forgot to reveal to Paul, the panicle salvation point of rome in the “real presence”.(No way, this causes a contradiction and makes an absurdity of God’s Word) But it does show that rome had used John 6 out of context with a carnal agenda.

My point from last post is that it’s clear the apostles did not teach real presence when they were establishing churches. So someone had moved the goal post, and yes we know that rome dose it frequently, so much so that she needs to use uninspired patristic writers and traditions of men instead of the inspired gospels to try to prove their own doctrine

Justin Martyr contradicts Ignatius of Antioch
Justin Martyr (110-165 AD)"Now it is evident, that in this prophecy allusion is made to the bread which our Christ gave us to eat, in remembrance of His being made flesh for the sake of His believers, for whom also He suffered; and to the cup which He gave us to drink, in remembrance of His own blood, with giving of thanks."
How do roman catholics trust in the patristic writers when clearly they don’t see eye to eye?

Fezik Said> I feel that you misinterpret this Scripture. If "flesh profits nothing" was to be taken as though flesh cannot be a component in something spiritual... then the sacrifice had no effect as it was the sacrifice of His "body" (Hebrews 10:10) that saves us.

Fezik you need to know that the sacrifice of our Lord at Calvary was the pivotal point from the old to the new. The old was carnal, physical, tangible of the flesh as opposed to the Spiritual which unseen, non tangible. Mk 14:58 “We heard him say, ‘I will destroy this temple made with human hands and in three days will build another, not made with hands.’”


Complete thread:

for Christians & Messianic Jews | Admin contact                   
14069 Postings in 4309 Threads, 163 registered users
[ Home ] [ Rules ] [ Gospel ] [ World News ] [ Israel News ] [ Online Bible ] [ Gays ] [ Abortion ] [ Masons ]

[ Jesus ][ Islam ][ Miracles ][ Near Death ][ Creationism ][ Bible Codes ] New Age ][ Israel ]

Christian Music ] [ Israel Video News ] [ [ Funny clips ] [ Games ]

other interesting sites:

(Apocalypse Board) (Answers in Genesis) (Spirit Daily) (Mallett Blog) (Parable of Lazarus) (23 min video in Hell) (Amil Imani) (1 hr Video on Hell) (Israel Travel Guide)  ( ( (Israelitybites) [Jesus paid for our debt] [26 End times signs]

Above hits since 19 April 2011
(red dots show where visitors are from)